A new installment of Tom Gammill's instructive series of videos on cartooning. Don't miss this episode's SURPRISE ENDING!
I'm looking forward to the Doozies comic with Dean Doozie standing over Tom Gammill's grave with a single, comically large tear on his cheek.
IN WHICH
- The Gang of Three TOTALLY SOLVES THE CONTENT PIRACY ISSUE (Worth The Price Of Admission Alone!);
- I get a book deal;
- I disclose a manual on how to make a BILLION DOLLARS AT THE BOX OFFICE, and where to park;
- Mark Frauenfelder discusses the great cartoonist who drew the above picture of Frankenstein's Monster;
- Dean Putney endorses Crudbump; And
- MUCH, MUCH MORE.
Click HERE to listen.
From "Ermal," in the gocomics comments:
"OK, I followed the chart, but now what do I do with all this frothy mixture?"
Especially funny with Tintin saying it...
There is no Tom the Dancing Bug on Boing Boing today -- in fact, there's no Boing Boing at all today -- in protest of SOPA/PIPA legislation.
Check back tomorrow.
I found, via Tom Spurgeon, this exhaustive history of Peanuts in comic books, in a blog on Timely-Atlas Comics.
This cover does look like it's by Charles Schulz, and it's amazing:
And this is a tantalizing glimpse of the first page of a four page story by Schulz:
The stuff not by Schulz, not surprisingly, does not look too good. This looks like a mediocre parody of a Peanuts strip, right down to the needlessly shouted punchline and levitating, cringing reacting characters.
But it would be a dream to collect all this in a popularly priced, historically respectful book (as Fantagraphics does so masterfully). Even the non-Schulz stuff was supposedly supervised by Schulz, and so holds some interest.
I spoke to Paige Braddock of Schulz Creative Associates a few months ago, and she said that they were considering a book of this material at one point, and might do so again.
Boom Studios? Fantagraphics? LET'S GET ON IT!!! <reaction shot of levitating, cringing comic book publishers>
--
To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).
I don't care much about the Academy Awards. But longtime readers of Tom the Dancing Bug will know that I do find the hype and excitement around them pretty funny.
I don't remember where or when, but years ago, I read an amazing article showing how one particular entertainment writer would keep writing, year after year, that THIS year's "Best Picture" Oscar race was particularly wide open, as opposed to previous years when it was absolutely clear which movie was going to win, or which couple of movies would contend. And the next year he'd write exactly the same thing.
I was reminded of that when I read this article this morning in The New York Times. Michael Cieply writes that while three movies have emerged as contenders -- "The Artist," "The Help," and "The Descendants" -- this year's race is particularly wide open:
"By this time last year, “The King’s Speech” had been all but crowned best picture, and the 2010 contest by January had turned into a match between “The Hurt Locker,” which ultimately won, and “Avatar,” which didn’t. This time around, more than a dozen pictures and their components are continuing to jostle for position in a chaotic contest."
I thought it would be interesting to do a quick Google search to test Cieply's memory.
Sure enough, last year, just a bit later than today's date, January 14, 2011, Melena Ryzik wrote in Cieply's New York Times blog, "The Carpetbagger," that nominations for an editing award had revealed an insider's picks for Best Picture contenders, narrowing the field to five favorites to contend.
"Here’s who to favor in your Oscar pool: “Black Swan,” “The Fighter,” “Inception,” “The King’s Speech” and “The Social Network.”"
No mention of a coronation.
In fact, even much later in January, on January 25, after the Oscar nominations had been announced, Cieply himself (with Brooks Barnes) called the Oscar race a "wild scramble". "The King's Speech" got the most nominations, but in their view that merely brought it into a pole position. And clearly, the day before there had been other frontrunners:
"“True Grit” surged into second position, and “The Social Network,” which had seemed a frontrunner, was matched by “Inception,” followed closely by “The Fighter.”"
What about 2010's race, which in January had apparently become a clear race between "The Hurt Locker" and "Avatar"? On January 24, 2010, Cieply referred to the race as a "wide-open contest," writing in his lead paragraph in a story, "The Oscar race turned into a free-for-all over the weekend." He does say that there is a "hot contest" between the two movies, but also includes "Inglorious Basterds" and any other movie that can be nominated, as competitors.
Next year, we'll all remember that in January 2012 it seemed all but inevitable that "Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son" would bring home the Oscar gold.
--
To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).
